To view this complete email in your browser, click here.
spacer
home
subscribe
logo
archives
contactus
spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer subheader spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer spacer

August 25, 2011

by Wesley J. Smith
spacer

side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar Medicare is going broke, almost everyone agrees.  But there, the comity ends. The big and very controversial question is, what do we do about it? How we answer that question will materially impact the health and wellbeing of our seniors, the economy's continuing viability, and the ethical values that serve as the foundation for the practice of medicine—and it turns out, the very future of American self governance.

Self governance? Let me explain. Politicians hate volatile issues such controlling Medicare cost inflation because of "third rail" controversies can rouse voters to kick them out of office. According to this careerist mindset, far better to protect their own political health by delegating responsibility for these difficult decisions to unelected bureaucrats. And here's the beauty part from the POV of the cynical politician: If regulators enact unpopular policies, they can self righteously point fingers against the very bureaucrats the elected officials empowered.

That is why the Affordable Care Act (sometimes called "Obamacare") legally established a new and popularly unaccountable bureaucratic method of controlling Medicare costs—the benignly named Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). Worse the law grants IPAB an unprecedented concentration of near-authoritarian power to make law in its area of jurisdiction. Made up of 15 "experts" nominated by the president and approved by the U.S. Senate, beginning in 2014, the IPAB won't merely "advise" policy makers as its name would imply. Nor is its power limited to implementing law that has already passed Congress and been signed by the president—the usual bureaucratic role. Rather, the IPAB will be a virtual mini government onto itself with the power to force Congress to legislate. Even more startlingly, the IPAB's decisions surmount a presidential veto and will be exempted from judicial oversight!

IPAB's power flows from its almost unchecked "fast track" authority to force the Congress to enact an annual accelerating cost-cutting agenda. Here's how it will work:

• By January 15 each year, IPAB must submit a proposal to Congress and the president for reaching Medicare savings targets in the coming year. The majority leaders in the House and Senate must introduce bills incorporating the board's proposal the day they receive it.

• Congress cannot "consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report  …  that would repeal or otherwise change the recommendations of the board" if such changes fail to meet the board's budgetary target.

• The secretary of health and human services must implement the Independent Payment Advisory Board's proposal, as passed by Congress and signed by the president, on August 15 of the year in which the proposal is submitted.

• If Congress does not pass the proposal or a substitute plan meeting the Independent Payment Advisory Board's financial target before August 15, or if the president vetoes the proposal passed by Congress, the original Independent Payment Advisory Board recommendations automatically take effect.

Further demonstrating the Star Chamber-like powers of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, Congress cannot consider any bill or amendment that would repeal or change this fast-track congressional consideration process without a three-fifths vote (60) in the Senate. And making the IPAB even more removed from democratic control, it can only be dismantled by a 3/5 vote of Congress, introduced between January 3-February 1, of 2017, and passed by August 15 of the same year, meaning after that date, its powers remain in perpetuity.

Defenders of IPAB blithely assure that the board does not have the power to ration care or cut benefits. True for now, but for how long? Even before the IPAB is up and running—beginning 2014—President Obama has stated he wants to increase its scope of policy options. Moreover, the influential New England Journal of Medicine has even proposed legally expanding IPAB's jurisdiction beyond Medicare to include "all payers," which would mean the private health insurance sector as well as public programs.

IPAB is anti democratic in that it removes lawmaking power from popularly elected officials to unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats. It already has the power to detrimentally impact the delivery of health care to Medicare recipients—say, by reducing compensation to doctors and hospitals, which could make it far more difficult for seniors to obtain care. Moreover, once cowardly politicians see that people will accept rule by bureaucrats, look for them to grant the IPAB even more muscular methods of cutting costs, such as the ability to ration care, perhaps even to altar benefits.

Worse, if Medicare costs can be controlled by bureaucratic fiat, why not delegate decision making about other volatile issues that cause politicians electoral headaches to all-powerful appointed boards of "experts?" In this sense, unless it is repealed or its powers reduced to the truly advisory, the IPAB could become the cornerstone of a new and democratically unaccountable bureaucratic state.

Bookmark and Share

spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
Rate It share content
spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer

Response to Buyer Beware:

I said much more about this general issue in this 1995 article in the Cato Journal: http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj15n1-7.html

Don
http://www.cafehayek.com/

Editor, ToTheSource Dear Editor: Arguing against allowing women to be paid to be surrogate mothers, Jennifer Lahl asserts that "commercial surrogacy, whether done legally [or illegally] is still selling babies" ("Babies for Sale, Buyer Beware"). Not so. Surrogate mothers are paid to assist infertile couples to have children. Each surrogate mother is compensated for choosing to give her time; for choosing to bear medical risks; and (if she still chooses after giving birth) for parting with her parental rights in the same way that each and every mother who gives her child up for adoption parts with her parental rights. On the other side of each of these voluntary exchanges is a couple desiring a child so fervently that they willingly pay a large sum of money to a woman who helps them navigate around the curse of infertility. Most of these couples have already paid huge sums of money to infertility clinics in unsuccessful attempts to get pregnant - yet, rightly, no one calls the voluntary exchanges that couples have with infertility clinics "baby selling." To label voluntary, mutually advantageous contracts between surrogate mothers and infertile couples "baby selling" is a grotesque mischaracterization, one that masks reality behind a blanket of hysteria. Children brought into the world through surrogacy contracts are no more "sold" than are children brought into the world through infertility treatments. Why should couples for whom infertility treatments fail be denied the joys of parenthood if they and willing surrogate mothers voluntarily agree to terms that bring new human beings to life? Sincerely, - D.B.


Response to The Face of Jesus:

I am here in Valence, France, speaking on "Knowing God" to a Navigator student camp, and one of the leaders just told me that a girl asked Jesus to reveal Himself to her this morning in their discussion group. I loved Rembrandt's exhibit in my city of Paris too...but I need to take objection to the 'picture' of Europe's spiritual state. God is doing a lot in Europe these days and there is a true rising up of young people in France...and the Cathedrals of France are centers of Catholic evangelism to the unbelievers in France and to tourists too. It is not encouraging to European Christians that we keep giving an image to a spiritual desert in Europe, when the Lord is answering our years of prayer and evangelism with the beginning of Spiritual Renewal. Thank you for TotheSource. I love reading it and praying through it. - M. G. Strasbourg, France

spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
Send your letter to the editor to feedback@tothesource.org.
spacer spacer
spacer spacer printer friendly iconClick for a Printer Friendly Version spacer spacer
spacer spacer
top
left links right
Price Gouging Spikes Drug Costs Up to 4500%, Purchasing Group Says
NICE rejects cancer drugs
 
 
bottom
about tothesource
We live complex lives. We strive to sort out priorities that sometimes conflict or seem incompatible. A moral framework is needed to help us understand the reality around us. Our Judeo-Christian heritage provides a framework to help us comprehend the choices we make and the conflicts that arise over them. It is not only the main source of our spiritual values, but also many of the secular values we depend on.

tothesource is a forum for integrating thinking and action within a moral framework that takes into account our contemporary situation. We will report the insights of cultural experts to the specific issues we face believing these sources will embolden people to greater faith and action.
subscribe
We invite you to subscribe to our free email service
that features informed opinion on current cultural issues.
wesley smith   Wesley J. Smith
Award winning author Wesley J. Smith, is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism, a special consultant to the Center for Bioethics and Culture, and a legal consultant for the Patient’s Rights Council.

He has authored or co-authored 12 books. His Forced Exit: The Slippery Slope from Assisted Suicide to Legalized Murder (1997), a broad-based criticism of the assisted suicide/euthanasia movement, is currently in its third updated version.

Smith’s book Culture of Death: The Assault on Medical Ethics in America, a warning about the dangers of the modern bioethics movement, was named One of the Ten Outstanding Books of the Year and Best Health Book of the Year for 2001 (Independent Publisher Book Awards). His current book is A Rat is a Pig is a Dog is a Boy: The Human Cost of the Animal Rights.
tothesource, P.O. Box 1292, Thousand Oaks, CA 91358
Phone: (805) 241-3138 | Fax: (805) 241-3158 | info@tothesource.org
spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer black line black line black line spacer