Dinesh
D’Souza bas been on CNN a dozen or so times in the past
few days answering questions about President Reagan. At the
age of 26 Dinesh was appointed senior domestic policy analyst
in President Reagan’s White House. His book on the Reagan
presidency has 200,000 copies in print. tothesource asked
Dinesh to give us some insight into Reagan’s unique
style of leadership.
tts:
About 50,000 pastors and Christian leaders will read this
email. Even those who disagree with Reagan’s policies
can hopefully learn something about leadership from a man
widely considered to be the most influential leader of the
last half-century. How about answering a couple of questions
for our loyal readers regarding Reagan the leader?
Dinesh:
Sure.
tts:
You have often said that Reagan’s presidency is a lesson
in principled leadership. Our readers know how tough it is
to make a decision based on principle and then have others
try to move you off that decision. On occasion Reagan was
at odds with his cabinet, with other world leaders, and with
the United States Congress. Yet on key issues he stuck to
his beliefs. How did he do it in the face of so much criticism?
Dinesh:
Reagan was a man of deep faith, not only in his religious
beliefs, but in his principles. Because of this confidence,
Reagan pursued his convictions and refused to yield his presidency
to the two most powerful forces in politics: the American
people, and the elites.
Today’s
politicians of both parties are obsessed with what the American
people think. They instruct their pollsters, “Go and
find out the views of the American people so that we can choreograph
our positions to bring them into line with public sentiment.”
They believe that this is a marvelous demonstration of democracy
in action.
But
this was not the American founders’ view of democracy,
and neither was it Reagan’s. Reagan knew that we live
in a representative democracy where the American people choose
leaders, and it is the leader’s job to lead. In many
cases this means taking action without consulting the people.
Many times during the 1980s Reagan came on television and
said something like, “My fellow Americans, I have just
signed an executive order removing gasoline price controls.”
Reagan
would often act and then ask us for our support. So Reagan
did seek the approval of the American people, but not necessarily
prior to pursuing a course of action. Reagan was willing to
endure short-term public opposition in order to vindicate
a longer-term objective.
It
reminds me of a funny story that Richard Wirthlin, Reagan’s
pollster, told me. The hard economic medicine of tight monetary
policy to fight the 1970’s runaway inflation had plunged
the country into recession. Interest rates soared, poverty
went up, and unemployment reached intolerable levels. It was
the worst economic crisis since the Depression. Wirthlin told
the president that his approval rating had plummeted to 35
percent. “Well Dick,” Reagan said, “I think
it’s time for you to arrange for me to be shot again.”
Although
Reagan was willing to brave widespread public discontent,
he was not willing to brave it indefinitely. “Stay the
course,” he told the American people during the recession.
But Reagan was determined that his policies be vindicated,
not just 20 years hence, but by 1984. In a democracy it is
imperative that the leader’s central objectives be met
by the next election.
In
short, Reagan knew that the American people would be patient
only so long. He needed results.
tts:
You mention Reagan’s confidence. He seemed confident
in his vision of America’s future.
Dinesh:
Reagan thought it was obvious that a vital American economy
would allow us to spend the Soviet Union out of existence.
He believed this at a time when many in America believed that
the period of American prosperity had passed. We had fallen
into a permanent malaise. Communism was considered the emerging
political force in the world. Nearly half of the world’s
population lived under communistic regimes. Yet two years
into his first term, with America in a recession, Reagan shocked
the world by proclaiming that Soviet Communism would end up
on “the ash heap of history”. Everyone dismissed
it as rhetoric, but Reagan believed it. That is how he saw
the world.
The
same is true for his famous Brandenburg Gate speech at the
end of his presidency. He challenged General Secretary Gorbachev
to, “Come here to this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, open this
gate. Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” Almost everyone
thought he was kidding.
Two
years later the wall came down. These were not just results
that Reagan predicted. He intended the outcome. He worked
for this outcome.
tts:
And Reagan had great faith and confidence in the American
people.
Dinesh:
After all, they had elected him to be their president in two
landslides (laughs). Reagan believed that, generally speaking,
the American people where more capable of managing the details
of their lives then someone else doing it for them. I am part
of a generation of young people who became interested in politics
because of the Reagan revolution. We saw Reagan as a cheerful,
forward-looking guy. We loved his self-deprecating humor.
Yet we also saw that beneath that jocular exterior, Reagan
was a determined leader with massively ambitious goals. This
was very infectious. I think all leaders, regardless of their
policies, can learn from this.
Reagan
led the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Berlin Wall came
crashing down, and the Soviet empire began to crumble. Today
communism and socialism are discredited. The American economy,
in the doldrums throughout the 1970s, went into high gear
in the 1980s, pulling the world economy up with it. During
his presidency the Dow Jones average tripled and the silicon
revolution began its transformation of the way we live and
work after Reagan eliminated most federal technology quotas.
Now computers and mobile phones are everywhere.
All
of these accomplishments required a leader that empowers people
to live their lives.
In
the end, Reagan gave the American people the credit.
I
think all of us can learn from Reagan’s confident leadership.
His unshakeable faith in closely held principles, his vision
of a better tomorrow, and his belief in the worth of every
human being should inspire all of us. |