If you are having trouble viewing this email, click here.
April 2, 2008
by Jennifer Roback Morse

side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar Recently the Second District Court of Appeal ruled that parents have no constitutional right to educate their children at home without state certification. In his written opinion, Justice H. Walter Croskey cited a long series of rulings indicating that the parental right to educate their own children is not absolute under American constitutional law. But the court’s ruling raises the serious question of whether it is good public policy for the State of California to insist that all children be educated by people who have a teaching credential. The most lucid arguments favor the position that homeschooling should be at least a permissible option, possibly even encouraged by the state.

On one level, the conflict is about the state control and regulation of education.  At a deeper level, the homeschooling battle is one front in a much larger conflict over who controls the future, through access to children.

So what objections do critics have against homeschooling?

First, let’s dispose of the child abuse argument. This particular ruling came as a response to alleged child abuse in a homeschooling family.  Homeschool opponents claim that permitting homeschooling increases child abuse. But let’s be clear--child abuse is already illegal. Requiring home educating parents to have a teaching credential will do nothing to prevent child abuse. Besides, children get abused at school, as well as at home. A Congressional study estimates that around 9% of American public school children are subject to sexual misconduct by a school employee sometime between kindergarten and 12th grade.


Second objection: home schooling is educationally inadequate.  In reality, the vast majority of homeschooled children do better than public school attendees. When so many children educated in public schools are unable to pass the high school exit exam mandated by the State of California, the claim that homeschooling is inadequate is not a serious argument.

Third objection: Local schools are paid by the state on the basis of attendance. But the State of California is struggling financially. K-12 education is facing proposed budget cuts of $4.4 billion. (SD Union Tribune March 6, 2008).  It is reasonable to believe that homeschooling is a net benefit to the state budget. Homeschooling parents pay their taxes, but do not use the services of the public schools. If the ruling holds and these kids are forced back into public schools, the cost will be immense. This scenario would be a budgetary and logistical nightmare, a bloodletting of state expenditures and good-will. Jack O’Connell, the California State Superintendent of Public Instruction– the equivalent of a department of education–now faces the potential crisis of dealing with tens of thousands of “truants.” O’Connell says he honestly doesn’t know what will happen next, adding that his department is reviewing the case, and “there is some angst in the field.”  Somehow, it hardly seems like a good use of scarce state resources to be barging in on families educating their children around the kitchen table, and dragging them off to over-crowded, under-performing, under-funded taxpayer supported schools.

Perhaps this California homeschool dispute represents a larger conflict over the future of society.  Whose children are these, anyway? One point of view is that children are gifts from God, given in trust to their parents who have the natural right to educate them.  Many homeschooling parents view themselves as stewards.

The competing point of view is that children belong to society, which grants parents the right to care for them.  The rights of parents are limited by the interests of the state. In a recent German homeschooling case, the European court held that parents may not refuse a state-provided education.

In his book A Nation of Bastards McGill University Professor Douglas Farrow argues that the competition for the control of children will only increase as children become more scarce.  Reproductive decisions tend to be correlated with political preferences: traditionalists tend to have more children than progressives. Traditionalists tend to favor parental education, while progressives tend to favor state education.  As the birthrate drops, the conflict over education can only become more intense.

This fight over homeschooling in California may be a harbinger of battles ahead.


Responses to No Intelligence Allowed:

You should do a similar documentary on whether carbon dioxide is the root cause of climate change. I think you'll find the same kind of persecution and discreditatioon toward scientists who believe the CO2 increase is primarily due to population increase and is not having significant impact on the climate - solar activity and its associated impact on the greehouse effect are. This issue has the potential to destroy our economy and our noational energy security and some sanity is urgently needed. The CO2 scam is not about being environmentally good stewards, it is abotu th money involved in a carbon trading scheme, one of which is being considered by congress now (Lieberamn -Warner bill). - NB

Please add me to your mailing list. We have experienced server problems and I have lost a few contacts. I very much enjoy your e-mails and look forward to each one with anticipation of using your information in one of my classes. I am a college professor of Ethics and Christian counseling. We MUST present a strong Christian apologetic from clear thinking individuals who will not compromise the gospel message while standing firm with the truth in the market place of ideas. Keep up the good work! Thank you, - Rich Schell

There is no contradiction between believing that God created all things and believing that evolution is the process He chose. - S

Send your letter to the editor to feedback@tothesource.org.
Click for a Printer Friendly Version
top
left links right
Criminalizing Home Schoolers
Budget goal: Cut out $11.2 million
AP: Sexual Misconduct Plagues US Schools
The Homeschool Movement
Kingdom of Children: Culture & Controversy in the Homeschooling Movement
Low Birth Rate Kills Economy, Society, New Film Shows
Low Birth Rate Is Becoming A Headache for Italy
Dropouts Required to Homeschool
Student Sues Wisconsin School After Getting a Zero for Religious Drawing
 
bottom
about tothesource
We live complex lives. We strive to sort out priorities that sometimes conflict or seem incompatible. A moral framework is needed to help us understand the reality around us. Our Judeo-Christian heritage provides a framework to help us comprehend the choices we make and the conflicts that arise over them. It is not only the main source of our spiritual values, but also many of the secular values we depend on.

tothesource is a forum for integrating thinking and action within a moral framework that takes into account our contemporary situation. We will report the insights of cultural experts to the specific issues we face believing these sources will embolden people to greater faith and action.
subscribe email a friend
We invite you to subscribe to our free email service
that features informed opinion on current cultural issues.
  Jennifer Roback Morse
Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D. brings a unique voice to discussions of love, marriage and the family. A committed career woman before having children, she earned a doctorate in economics, and spent fifteen years teaching at Yale University and George Mason University. The devastating experience of infertility changed her life and her research program, for the better! In 1991, she and her husband adopted a two year old Romanian boy, and gave birth to a baby girl. She left her full-time university teaching post in 1996 to move with her family to California. She was a Research Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. She is now a part-time Research Fellow at the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty, and writes and speaks about love, marriage and the family. Until August 2006, Dr. Morse and her husband were foster parents for San Diego County, where they now reside.
tothesource, P.O. Box 1292, Thousand Oaks, CA 91358
Phone: (805) 241-3138 | Fax: (805) 241-3158 | info@tothesource.org
counter create hit