The budding green branches of the approaching Spring remind us all of the promise of God's goodness written so beautifully in a green hand on the natural world He created.  For those of Irish ancestry, it is also the time when we celebrate the life and work of St. Patrick who brought the good news of the Gospel to the Emerald Isle and her people. 

Who was this man Patrick, and what were his great accomplishments that so many should celebrate him more than 1500 years after he left this earth?  Like St. Nicholas, whose identity has been utterly changed into that of a child's Christmas fantasy, the name of St. Patrick is now more generally associated with parades, "Kiss Me I'm Irish" buttons and green bagels than with the great work of evangelization that was his life's work.  But Patrick was, as Nicholas, a real person.

Many details about Patrick are lost to us, but there is agreement on several key facts.  Patrick was not Irish; he was born on the island of Britain possibly to a Roman family in about the year 387 AD.  Raised in relative comfort, his name in Latin was Patricius.  At the age of 16 years, he was kidnapped by a party of marauding Irish raiders, carried to Ireland, and sold into slavery.  He was sent by his Irish master to tend sheep on the misty hills of Ulster.  Miserable and alone, he turned increasingly to prayer.  He served this solitary exile for six years until in a dream God told him to flee from his captivity. Walking a great distance to the coast, he found the ship that would take him back to his family.

The reunion with his family was only temporary.  In another dream, he described hearing a call from the people of Ireland to come back to them and walk among them.  Patrick understood this as God's call to missionary service to go as a Christian witness to the Irish.  In answer to that call, he traveled to France where he undertook studies for the priesthood.  He was eventually ordained by St. Germanus, the Bishop of Auxerre. 

Pope Celestine I eventually entrusted to Patrick the mission of evangelizing the Irish, who, on their isolated island, were a pagan and warlike people having never been conquered by the legions of Rome. Fulfilling his youthful dream, Patrick, now a bishop in the company of several disciples, returned to Ireland in March of the year 433 AD.  He was almost 50 years old.

Not a great deal is known of Patrick's preaching, but he and his companions were certainly fearless to approach such a fierce, unfriendly population with faith their only protection.  However, one story endures.  It is that of his use of the simple three-leafed Irish shamrock to illustrate to the high king at the capital at Tara the nature of the Blessed Trinity - Three Persons in One God.  It is significant that the shamrock, the metaphor for God Himself, has come down through the centuries as the symbol of the Irish people.

Thomas Cahill, author of "How the Irish Saved Civilization,"  points out that one of the most remarkable things about St. Patrick's evangelization of Ireland is that it was peaceful.  Christianity had come to many other nations in Europe at the point of a sword,  only in the bloody aftermath of Roman conquest. Not so Ireland.  In those other cases, the conquered nations had accepted Christianity.  But in this case, Christianity had accepted Ireland.  The evangelizing work of Patrick and those who helped him and came after him was completely successful.

Another of Cahill's observations is that this universal conversion fortuitously came just in time for Christian Ireland to become the repository for almost 200 years of the culture and civilization of Christian Europe, which at that very time was falling into the shadows of barbarian invasion.  In due course, Christian missionaries came out of Ireland bringing back to Europe that which had lain beyond the reach of the invaders who had destroyed the Roman Empire.  It is not by accident that Ireland has been called the Isle of Saints and Scholars.

From the days of St. Patrick, who died on March 17, 461, down to the present, the Irish have been steadfast in their Christian faith.  As a nation, they have suffered much through the centuries.  Perhaps the greatest sorrow is that so many have been forced to wander far from the island to which Patrick came to bring them spiritual life.  It is not surprising then that when the sons and daughters of Ireland celebrate who they are they  do so on the feast of their great spiritual benefactor.

Dinesh D'Souza Debates David Holmes at William and Mary College Regarding Wren Chapel Cross Removal

Last Fall, William and Mary College President Gene Nichol made the decision to remove a 2 foot brass cross from the altar of William and Mary's historic Wren Chapel. In an email to the community explaining his decision President Nichol wrote:

"I have been saddened to learn of potential students and their families who have been escorted into the chapel on campus tours and chosen to depart immediately thereafter," he said. "And to hear of a Jewish student, required to participate in an honor council program in the chapel during his first week of classes, vowing never to return to the Wren."

This unilateral action by President Nichol unleashed a hue and cry on both sides of the decision. Philosophy professor George W. Harris wrote, "To say that the change has caused a fuss would be like referring to the Civil War as the 'late unpleasantness,' especially in Virginia, where the abhorrence of change and the value of tradition are sometimes hard to distinguish. A petition containing thousands of signatures and a call for restoring the cross has accompanied charges of 'political correctness gone amuck' and 'secularism running wild.' CNN has produced a prime-time report on the event, and conservative writer Dinesh D’Souza has challenged College President Gene Nichol to a public debate."

Though President Nichol did not debate D'Souza, Religious Studies professor William Holmes did. On February 1st an overflow crowd gathered to hear Professor Holmes and Dinesh D'Souza debate the question: Should the cross be returned to Wren Chapel?

While Professor Holmes focused his remarks primarily on the finer points of the history of religious architecture and of the chapel itself, D'Souza zeroed in on examining the inconsistent reasoning behind President Nichol's decision for removing the cross and the flawed assumptions about church/state separation behind much of the sentiment expressed in support of limiting the display of the cross in the chapel.

JOINT STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF VISITORS AND THE PRESIDENT - March 6, 2007

President and Board Accept Committee Recommendation on Wren Cross

Following its meeting yesterday, the William and Mary Committee on Religion in a Public University unanimously recommended a compromise practice on the display of the table cross in the Wren Chapel. We accept and will immediately begin to implement the Committee’s recommendations, which we quote in full:

"THE WREN CHAPEL CROSS SHALL BE RETURNED FOR PERMANENT DISPLAY IN THE CHAPEL IN A GLASS CASE. THE CASE SHALL BE LOCATED IN A PROMINENT, READILY VISIBLE PLACE, ACCOMPANIED BY A PLAQUE EXPLAINING THE COLLEGE'S ANGLICAN ROOTS AND ITS HISTORIC CONNECTION TO BRUTON PARISH CHURCH. THE WREN SACRISTY SHALL BE AVAILABLE TO HOUSE SACRED OBJECTS OF ANY RELIGIOUS TRADITION FOR USE IN WORSHIP AND DEVOTION BY MEMBERS OF THE COLLEGE COMMUNITY."

St. Patrick's Legacy

When Patrick headed back to Ireland, he was the first missionary to venture into the land of the barbarians, denoted on medieval maps by the phrase: “Here do monsters be.” As the Roman Empire crumbled, St. Patrick challenged pagan practices.

Within his lifetime Irish slave trade and the practice of human sacrifice came to an end. Violence and intertribal warfare decreased significantly in response to his leadership.

Send your letter to the editor to feedback@tothesource.org.