If you are having trouble viewing this email, click here.

February 25, 2009

by tothesource

side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar Transfixed by soaring home prices during the housing boom, tens of millions of Americans installed ATM machines in the foyers of their homes to access the cash.  We now know the coin was two sided; heads ostentatious possessions but tails long-term debt.  It turns out there is a big price to pay for thoughtless bling.

Which brings to mind Damien Hirst, a Britartist clever enough to turn an obsession with death into a lucrative career.  He came to international prominence in 1990 when Charles Saatchi, the advertising genius who self-describes as "fantastically rich" climbed out of his green Rolls Royce at a Hirst warehouse show. Mesmerized in front of Hirst's A Thousand Years, a large glass case containing maggots and flies feeding off a rotting cow's head, Saatchi couldn't write the check fast enough.

Building on the putrefying flesh boom, Hirst went on to dissect whole animals, including sheep and cows.  They sell for millions.  During the financial collapse this past September, Sotheby's sold $198 million of his art, including $20 million for The Golden Calf, an animal with 18-carat gold horns and hooves preserved in formaldehyde.

Sometimes he doesn't cut the animals up.  His The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living is a whole shark floating in a vitrine.  It sold for $12 million in 2004.

In 2006 he showed at the Royal Academy of Arts in London his 35 foot tall Virgin Mother with layers of her body removed to show the fetus, her skull, and some muscles.  He has done three Virgin Mothers.  The one in front of the Lever House on Park Avenue in New York City has colored body parts, which contrast nicely against the seminal glass box.

At the height of the banality bubble in May of 2007, Hirst unveiled with great British pomp the centerpiece of his Beyond Belief show, his much-anticipated For the Love of God.  Unlike Jack Kevorkian who paints using his blood as pigment, Hirst merely collects human remains for inspiration.  He loves skulls.  And why not?  He's got the cash and obviously knows how to work a trend.  Struck by his artistic muse, Hirst got a hankering to cover one from chin to crown with flawless diamonds and see if anyone would buy it.  So he went to none other than her Majesty's (and Madonna's) jeweler, Bentley & Skinner and convinced them to recreate the skull in platinum and adorn it with 8,601 diamonds weighing 1,106 carats.  The center stone alone is 52.4 carrots.  It is a spectacular memento mori, so brilliant that the jewelers had to cover it in black velvet and work through slits to see their work.  It sold for $100 million.

Who knows how much of this art tab we are currently bailing out?

At the risk of sounding apocalyptic, after seven years of the tech bubble and seven years of the housing bubble, we may be heading into seven years of financial draught.  That may well end up being a good thing.  Wiping out trillions of dollars of wealth has a way of clearing the mind. Certainly diminished, America could emerge from this crisis having relearned prudence and responsibility.  There really are, after all, unavoidable financial consequences to how we live our lives.

Great works of art, like the coins we drained out of our homes, are two sided.  They inspire us with carpe diem, or "seize the day", but their flip side, which we like to ignore, is memento mori, or "remember that you must die". Try as we might to cover over our material mortality with glitz, great art reminds us of the fleetingness of earthly vanities.  Ironically, though featured at his Beyond Belief exhibition, For the Love of God helps us see if we need to get beyond anything, it's lifeless, mindless ostentation.  Our hope must lie elsewhere.

Send your letter to the editor to feedback@tothesource.org.

Responses to Francis Collins' New Project:

Dear tothesource.org producers, As a Private School Administrator I find your articles insightful, concise, challenging, and balanced. Do you allow non-profits to utilize your resources and information for reprinting, rebroadcasting, or synopsing, as long as we cite you as the source? I find I am often unable to articulate these clear responses to secular humanism and social reconstruction with the precision that you do. - A.H.

OK, I'm on board with much of what you guys have to say, but pushing Dr. Collins' ideas is a bit over the top. I thought in many of your articles that you question common descent. You question whether evolution could have continued without any supernatural intervention. You question whether natural selection could have been the means by which all the diversity and new genetic information was developed. The only thing he says that is different from the methodological naturalists is that God was involved in the creation of life itself. From then on it is full blown random evolution. This is what so many people are beginning to question. How can you fit common descent into the Bible when we're told that God created Adam and Eve from the dust of the earth in His own image, different from all the other animals? This guy has to throw out the first 11 chapters of the Bible as well as tidbits here and there later on in the biblical record in order to hold those views. Just because someone is a Christian doesn't mean his views are worthwhile pushing. If we agree with Collins, we might as well join in the celebration of Darwin this year, because Collins believes in unguided evolution from amoebas to astronauts. But evidence and skepticism is piling up against this view these days. I'm surprised you are pushing his views. - disappointed in Tokyo


The Bible explicitly states that the earth was created in a short amount of time, and that humans were created from the dust of the earth. So how is it OK to be so enthusiastic about a man who is merely saying: "Hey evolution is great, I'm just going to say that God did it" Francis is not anybody new, the God induced evolution theory seems more like a cop out than anything. I wish I knew what tothesource's real stand on this issue was. I have to say I'm rather disappointed. - Tucker from Norman, Oklahoma

I was watching your debate with Daniel Dennett and you said something about the Bible and its infallibility. Just wondering, what's your stance on that? - R.T.

I just read Sally Morem's letter in reply to Darwin's Dis-ease. I was surprised to learn that the scientific meaning of "fit" is fertility, in the sense that it's used for Darwin's theory of evolution. What does this mean in regard to the issue of abortion? How do we deal with it? My decision to have an abortion will naturally reduce the population of those who tend to leave more offspring. Or it will relax the selection pressure with enough food for all the offspring to survive without a need for variety and fecundity. There is no way to know before hand which unborn is the right one to kill with out upsetting the balance of natural selection. Genesis 9:1 Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth. This is probably an old argument. I was just shocked at my ignorance of what "Survival of the fittest" really means. Thank you, - Steve Applen

Click for a Printer Friendly Version
top
left links right
C. H. Spurgeon - A Biography
Damien Hirst talks about "A Thousand Years"
 
bottom
about tothesource
We live complex lives. We strive to sort out priorities that sometimes conflict or seem incompatible. A moral framework is needed to help us understand the reality around us. Our Judeo-Christian heritage provides a framework to help us comprehend the choices we make and the conflicts that arise over them. It is not only the main source of our spiritual values, but also many of the secular values we depend on.

tothesource is a forum for integrating thinking and action within a moral framework that takes into account our contemporary situation. We will report the insights of cultural experts to the specific issues we face believing these sources will embolden people to greater faith and action.
subscribe email a friend
We invite you to subscribe to our free email service
that features informed opinion on current cultural issues.
tothesource, P.O. Box 1292, Thousand Oaks, CA 91358
Phone: (805) 241-3138 | Fax: (805) 241-3158 | info@tothesource.org