If you are having trouble viewing this email, click here.
 
October 9, 2007
by Stephen M. Barr

side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar side bar There is a great deal of ignorant nonsense in circulation about Christianity's historical role.  It is said that Christianity has been peculiarly intolerant, that it has been hostile to scientific inquiry, that it has been blind to social evils like slavery, that it has been oppressive to women, that it has stood in the way of political and economic progress, that it is superstitious.  The bill of indictment grows ever longer.  What is most galling to those who know some history is that most of these accusations are not merely inaccurate, but the very reverse of the truth.  And what is so refreshing about Dinesh D'Souza's book, "What's So Great About Christianity", is that it meets all of these accusations head-on and decisively refutes them.  In our day Christianity is subject to an uncompromising, root-and-branch attack.  D'Souza gives an equally uncompromising defense. Uncompromising in the good sense that he does not compromise with falsehood.  He does, however, take the arguments of his opponents seriously --- seriously enough to give them good answers.

The book discusses the influence of Christianity in social and political life, science and rational thought, and morality.  In the chapters on social and political life D'Souza shows how Christianity lies at the root of three enormously important ideas that have shaped Western society and, latterly, the world.

The first of these is the idea of "separating or disentangling the spheres of religion and government", which he traces back to Christ's words "give unto Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's".

The second is that "ordinary people are fallible, and yet these fallible people matter".  From this core Christian belief have flowed, he argues, "the nuclear family, the idea of limited government, the Western concept of the rule of law, and our culture's high emphasis on the relief of suffering".

The third idea is fundamental equality of human beings and their dignity as creatures made in the image of God.  As he shows, "[t]his Christian idea was the propelling force behind the campaign to end slavery, the movement for democracy and popular self-government, and also the successful attempt to articulate an international doctrine of human rights."

One of the great virtues of this book is its breadth of spirit.  Sadly, at certain times in the past, members of various Christian groups have hurled accusations at each other, often magnifying each other's faults for the sake of short-term apologetic or polemical advantage.  Many of the exaggerated claims once made by Christians against each other are now picked up and used to discredit Christianity by those who have contempt for all religion.  D'Souza's book should help Christians to see things from a higher historical perspective, from which it is evident how all Christians, ancient, medieval, and modern, Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox, have contributed in innumerable ways to the great historical achievements of the Christian religion.

The middle part of the book consists of seven chapters on the relation between Christianity and science.  In no area, perhaps, has there been more distortion of the historical record than here.  If one asks most people (and I have asked many audiences) what name they associate with the Church's relation to science, the name that jumps to their lips is Galileo. D'Souza devotes a whole chapter to the Galileo affair, showing how the polemics of the past have worked to give people a luridly exaggerated notion of what happened in that case.  But what is far worse is the way the whole rest of Christianity's relationship with science over 800 years has been almost completely blanked out by the obsessive focus on one highly atypical (though admittedly important) episode.

D'Souza shows how the Christian faith nurtured the roots of modern science in the medieval period, with the founding of the universities and the groundbreaking work of such scientists as Albertus Magnus, Robert Grosseteste, and Francis Bacon.  He shows how many of the great founders of modern science, such as Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Boyle, Faraday, and Maxwell were men of deep Christian faith, and how even in the twentieth century we find gigantic contributions to the development of science being made by men of faith like Fr. Lemaître, the Belgian priest who was one of the two founders of the Big Bang theory of cosmology.  But D'Souza's argument runs deeper.  He shows that the rise of modern science was not simply the result of the genius or wisdom of particular men, but rather flowed from deepest levels of the Christian world-view, with its embrace of reason, its faith in the intelligibility of the world that had been created by Reason (the Logos) itself, and its interest in the particularities of that world in all its materiality.

This part of the book is of special interest to me, as a research physicist and as one who writes extensively on matters of science and religion.  D'Souza's treatment of this subject is balanced and sophisticated. I especially appreciate his treatment of evolution, where he finds the sane middle ground that is occupied by the great majority of those Christians who are scientists.


The last part of the book addresses morality.  While many atheists are highly moral and even heroically so, atheism as a doctrine strikes at the root of morality.  It does so not only by making of man no more than a congeries of atoms and therefore a creature without the possibility of genuine moral or intellectual freedom, but also by eliminating the idea of an objective standard of morality that stands above the human mind, and by eliminating the idea that we shall all someday have to answer for our lives to an all-just judge.  D'Souza shows how dreadful the consequences of this can be, by examining the historical record of avowedly atheist political regimes.

I have not been able to do justice to this book in so short a review.  Perhaps I can sum up by saying that if I were to suggest one book as an antidote to the anti-Christian tirades of Dawkins, Dennett, Hitchens, et al, it would be this one.

 

Responses to When Pigs Fly and Monkeys Type:

I have been reading To The Source newsletter for several weeks now and I agree that the Christian scholarship which takes place is necessary to keep truth from being drowned in the flood of evolutionary backwash. After last week's column on the various debates taking place, the thought occurred to me that we are still playing into the atheists hand in these debates. The question which every atheist must answer, but will not occur in a scientific debate is this: Why don't you want there to be a God? The answer, of course, is that one wants to live life without accountability. This question wouldn't be allowed because it isn't "scientific", but the real reason is that it would destroy the house of cards. - Bill Reynolds Mountain Home, AR

I just finished reading, with delight I might add, the wonderful article of Dr. Gerald Schroeder intitled "When Pigs Fly & Monkeys Type!" What an outstanding piece of work. With secularism, athiesm, and hatred for Christianity on the rise such a work as Dr. Schroeder is a breath of fresh air. And, may I say I inhaled deeply. I am afraid this world is headed for a dark time as forcasted through Scripture but the darkness only makes the candle Dr. Schroeder lit shine that much brighter. May Our Father Bless you, - Larry Stanford Albuquerque, NM

It always saddens me to read articles or hear people talk about Christianity vs. Science or similar garbage. We spend far too much time as Christians and humans finding conflict and reason to disagree. Why must we always seek polar positions. God created the heavens and earth vs. Man evolved over time. To deny either of these propositions, in my way of thinking, if foolish. To say that Man was created by God exactly as we exist today is to deny reality of change which is a human condition. We are taller as a species today than 200 years ago, for example. Many of the changes over the centuries can be attributed to dietary changes, medicine and other obvious reasons, but do these not also indicate a form of adaptation and mutation of the species. Does not the taller parent tend to have taller offspring? Why is every person an individual if we were all created in God's image? Was God Black, Caucasian, Male, Female, etc? Many of these points would show favour towards a Darwinian view, however I would also suggest that is an equally flawed perspective. As indicated by Dr. Schroeder the odds of everything lining up without some form of assistance is impossible to believe. - Darryl MacLeod

Thanks for the article. Here’s something I find really funny. It’s been said that a million monkeys banging on a million keyboards would eventually produce a Shakespeare sonnet, but certainly the invention of the Internet has proved that theory wrong! - Glenn in Thornton Colorado

This is what I subscribe for. Excellent article. Combined with the former articles on creation this completes a powerful logical apologetic for the existence of God and His role in the creation of our universe. Thank you so much. - Darryl KLassen , Langley .B.C.
Send your letter to the editor to feedback@tothesource.org.
Click for a Printer Friendly Version
top
left links right
The Devil’s Chaplain
tothesource - What's So Great About Christianity by Dinesh D'Souza
 
 
bottom
about tothesource
We live complex lives. We strive to sort out priorities that sometimes conflict or seem incompatible. A moral framework is needed to help us understand the reality around us. Our Judeo-Christian heritage provides a framework to help us comprehend the choices we make and the conflicts that arise over them. It is not only the main source of our spiritual values, but also many of the secular values we depend on.

tothesource is a forum for integrating thinking and action within a moral framework that takes into account our contemporary situation. We will report the insights of cultural experts to the specific issues we face believing these sources will embolden people to greater faith and action.
subscribe email a friend
We invite you to subscribe to our free email service
that features informed opinion on current cultural issues.
Gerald Schroeder   Stephen M. Barr

Stephen M. Barr is a professor of physics at the University of Delaware. He received his Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1978. He does research in theoretical particles physics, with emphasis primarily on "grand unified theories" and the cosmology of the early universe.  He also writes and lectures extensively on the relation of science and religion.  Many of his articles and reviews have appeared in First Things, on whose editorial advisory board he serves. He is the author of the book Modern Physics and Ancient Faith (Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 2003) and A Student's Guide to Natural Science (Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2006).

tothesource, P.O. Box 1292, Thousand Oaks, CA 91358
Phone: (805) 241-3138 | Fax: (805) 241-3158 | info@tothesource.org

counter create hit